Myrtle Beach Misconduct Revisited

[infinitempg]

Damn, didn't realize HO could just "revisit" a punishment whenever they wanted, even after the punishment was given and upheld by the appeals committee. I don't recall that being in the rules anywhere. This is literally like taking someone back to court for the same crime, with no new evidence, just because you changed your mind about the decision; it isn't allowed and for good reason. Even if the punishment didn't fit the allegation, ammending an already given punishment at this point is ludicrous and should be a punishable action itself.

this punishment was the recommendation from appeals btw. this isn't double jeopardy or anything

welcome back