(05-29-2020, 05:37 AM)TomHanks Wrote:Just for clarity’s sake, are you referring the the butter tampering case in your example? Because the first butter tampering case was a carbon copy of yours lmao
1. He wasn’t in the war room
2. He definitely wasn’t lined up to be co-GM
3. The player in question referenced potentially opting out
4. Butter made a comment that “Safety is kind of a need” in New Orleans, which lead to the punishment
Your argument is based on the two events being completely different. They weren’t. Talk to anyone who was around when that happened
Sorry, I guess I was referring to the third time he did it? The vibe from HO was that we were using the precedent from the case where he had multiple contacts with the person he tampered. And if he got fined 5m for that comment, then that seems a bit overkill.
