Clarification to my comments to Amidships: Do I think that the letter of the law was followed? Yes. That doesn't necessarily mean that I thought there was a violation to begin with, because I think it unlikely that it was a tampering attempt. That said, tampering is something that needs to be enforced rather strictly in order to prevent any appearance of shady activity, so I don't necessarily disagree with the fact that punishment occurred. So, I think the rules were followed, but that doesn't mean that there isn't room for the rule itself to be changed to try to avoid over-enforcement, etc.
Just wanted to briefly explain some of the nuance to my position. Amidships wasn't wrong. Just wanted to fully explain.
Great podcast!
Just wanted to briefly explain some of the nuance to my position. Amidships wasn't wrong. Just wanted to fully explain.
Great podcast!
