(06-02-2020, 05:27 AM)YoungTB Wrote:Same reason why someone thought that the player first in all-time yards from scrimmage didn’t deserve HOF.
(06-02-2020, 05:12 AM)AdamS Wrote:Yeah its weird. Berry had a great season with almsot no peers. 42 had an even greater season with almsot no HISTORICAL peers. Whoever didn't vote for Berry I just dont understand. Whoever didn't vote for 42...YOU dont understand.
I'll just say it here for ease. I DM'd Bex about this being a huge problem (Has this always been the case?) and it will continue to be in this system so hopefully HO at least talk about it.
I'm very happy OLs finally got included. It is real progress and 1 of the reasons I turned into OL was to help the position and help prove what a prime OL can give teams but we're not that hard to judge. It's total pancakes and how many sacks you give up (With a small % being how much better your RB and offence can do with you helping) overall.
But the rest of the amazing OLs will catch up to Lazzy and I would really hate to see me lose pro bowl (Under a situation my stats still qualify lazzy as one of the better options but misses it due to 2-3 bad eggs with silly reasons insta-nope'ing me). That is just my personal POV. Yet alone the truly competitive positions all fighting for a handful of spots.
This shouldn't be a popularity contest vote. Me and Frick don't get on anymore but I'd still vote Mo Berry lol.