(07-16-2017, 09:26 PM)kckolbe Wrote:How come draft prospects weren't included? Some of them are way over 50 TPE
The highest was at 125 TPE, second at 122. They were the only 2 over 100, and they simply wouldn't compare with the top 11. I did look at them, it just wasn't worth including them in the article. I already had a number of guys listed there that I wasn't going to talk about.
![[Image: SymmNSFL.gif]](http://sig.grumpybumpers.com/host/SymmNSFL.gif)
