(07-16-2017, 10:05 PM)DillyDing Wrote:From the rule-book:It was presented in head office and investigated by more than just myself. It was discussed with multiple people but the "evidence" presented is weak at best at this point and is not anything that we are willing to punish over.
Baller, if we are going to sweep this under the rug, that's fine - but remove the tampering stuff from the rulebook.
Better to get rid of the tampering rules then be presented with evidence of tampering and do nothing about it.
@Ballerstorm
Are there things that seem fishy, yes, but without evidence proving something occuring we cannot throw punishments around, or else things like you making Legion sigs for Berc would apply in the same vein, as supporting pieces to weak evidence.
@youngcricket and myself with the help of our head office advisor @Durden didn't sweep this under the rug. We took a serious look at what was there for us to investigate.