I knew there was a great reason you were drafted to our team. I do find it interesting how tackling and endurance basically seem to have inverted relationships with performance and their priority in the overall algorithm.(I had 120 tackles as a slot CB with a tackle rating of 50 the entire season)
As for the QB situation, only two archetypes can reach 79 speed. And there are only a few sets of playbooks that allow to QB to act as a primary running option where the 79 speed has real effect.
It would be interesting to see if the other archetypes have a similar speed exploit with a different rating(likely wont be the same rushing totals, but is there a scaled down ratio of the same exploit?). And how many playbooks can effectively take advantage of the speed exploit?
Wonder if this is the only position that experiences this?
As for the QB situation, only two archetypes can reach 79 speed. And there are only a few sets of playbooks that allow to QB to act as a primary running option where the 79 speed has real effect.
It would be interesting to see if the other archetypes have a similar speed exploit with a different rating(likely wont be the same rushing totals, but is there a scaled down ratio of the same exploit?). And how many playbooks can effectively take advantage of the speed exploit?
Wonder if this is the only position that experiences this?
