the one thing I can think of that would help this is if there was a way to determine catch % against and completion % against to truly capture how stingy or leaky individual DB's are.
In addition, a differential of yards oer catch/yards per game for an elite WR against the CB versus against the league/the WR's normal average could also help
Otherwise, I like the list, in my totally unbiased view. I still fear judges will look at the raw numbers and not consider other factors such as: matching up against every team's #1 WR, not having a solid pass rush to help derail passing attacks, not being able to face the Royals offense myself(the main reason the Tijuana bot has such a huge gap is because it racked up 2 INTs and a Def TD, along with other madness, against London in week 5 ---- but in the reverse fixture, we held them to three red zone field goals as we blanketed Howlett and Vequain, the #1 WR duo, as much as we could for 3.5 quarters.)
In addition, a differential of yards oer catch/yards per game for an elite WR against the CB versus against the league/the WR's normal average could also help
Otherwise, I like the list, in my totally unbiased view. I still fear judges will look at the raw numbers and not consider other factors such as: matching up against every team's #1 WR, not having a solid pass rush to help derail passing attacks, not being able to face the Royals offense myself(the main reason the Tijuana bot has such a huge gap is because it racked up 2 INTs and a Def TD, along with other madness, against London in week 5 ---- but in the reverse fixture, we held them to three red zone field goals as we blanketed Howlett and Vequain, the #1 WR duo, as much as we could for 3.5 quarters.)
