(07-31-2020, 03:07 PM)Beefstu409 Wrote:This looks great! Definitely one limitation/inaccuracy of my method is the first few picks being undervalued. What I don't understand is how you came to 5000, 3000, 2000, 1500, 1000 for the first 5 picks?
Ha, I was gonna make that an FAQ - 100% arbitrary and based on a few draft charts I've seen in the past, though I don't think the curve needs to be quite as steep as the NFL one... there's way more top-end depth in the ISFL.
(07-31-2020, 03:07 PM)Beefstu409 Wrote:If I'm reading right it was somewhat arbitrary just to give higher value to those picks (and I believe this is a better value for them) but is it possible for pick 6 to be worth more than 1000?
I'm on mobile right now so couldn't super review the numbers, maybe this is covered by your normalization to 100 then x 10 that would make it impossible for 6 to be worth more than 1000.
Yeah, it's capped at 91.something... whatever the last bit of Formula B is. It's never hitting 920.
(07-31-2020, 03:07 PM)Beefstu409 Wrote:Either way this is very cool! And I agree the back end of the draft is almost always valueless, but it varies from year to year, scouts have to see who is/isn't inactive to adjust for that.
Thanks man, and a bigger thanks for the idea. I really enjoyed doing this.
![[Image: kZQaK3s.png]](https://i.imgur.com/kZQaK3s.png)
![[Image: mK4dAxg.png]](https://i.imgur.com/mK4dAxg.png)