(12-08-2020, 10:26 PM)slate Wrote: On the graphics one, I don't understand why that (and some other similar rules that have been proposed) needed to be passed during a rules summit. There's no rule specifying the Twitter or Media grading scales, those teams just come up with them (presumably with HO approval). If the Graphics team really wants to limit submissions, why did they need to put it on a rules summit ballot rather than changing it themselves?
In general what each department does and doesn't have the authority to do on their own, and what things should be handled by league vote vs. handled by department decision, should be much better defined IMO.
I tend to agree that a lot of stuff ends up in rules summits that doesn't need to be. But I don't think we do any vetting on submissions - I guess that would cause it's own drama and accusations of HO bias and lust for power. We tend to let the voting sort it out.