(01-19-2021, 06:49 PM)qWest Wrote:Ok, that's a fair argument. Toriki might not have deserved it. But this "voter bias" theory is a little paranoid and completely baseless. I refer you to Modern Duke's yearly awards voting bias media, in which NOLA and Bex consistently rank among the least biased voters in the league. Plus, even if Rotchburns or Toriki are taken out I am not sure if you make it in still. You were eighth in rushing yards in the ASFC.(01-19-2021, 06:35 PM)mithrandir Wrote:(01-19-2021, 06:15 PM)slate Wrote:To put in perspective how bad 3.4 YPC is: Trent Richardson's career average is 3.3 YPC. How good is 5.3 YPC? Jim Brown's career average is 5.2 YPC.(01-19-2021, 06:06 PM)qWest Wrote: Also the "efficiency" argument is just silly as a point to vote for someone over someone else with 2x the TDs and 3.5x the pancakes. If an RB rushes for 3.4 ypc they get a first down every 3 downs. Anything after that is bonus. What should matter way more than how quickly a player produces positive plays for an offense is the number of positive plays they produce, especially when it directly gets points on the board.
Ah yes, this is why RBs that can average 3.4 ypc are a hot commodity in all levels of football.
Jim Brown also averaged 14 TDs in a season. Trent Richardson averaged 6.33.
And if we really think 3.4 ypc is so terribly disqualifying, Toriki was as close to that number (3.8 ypc) as Nakamura was to her (4.2 ypc), while also leading Nakamura by fewer TDs than he leads Rotchburns by (20 vs 15 vs 7). The inconsistency of voters there is appalling, no wonder some people think they must be biased for certain teams.
![[Image: Mith.png]](https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/754506686688919573/1049975202924199986/Mith.png)
![[Image: Witten_HOF_3.png]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/760203360971784263/1014156341608202280/Witten_HOF_3.png)