(02-19-2021, 06:26 PM)shadyshoelace Wrote:(02-19-2021, 06:16 PM)iStegosauruz Wrote: So looks like on my end you missed getting credit for the career TFLs - apologies about that. I was dealing with 1164 net players and thought I double checked everything but must've missed you. I almost left out Alex D. completely so it was bound to happen to someone. I just recalculated and recalibrated it with you getting the proper weighting for career TFLs and you shoot to roughly 98% - probably some noise its just a quick rerun of the model. Like thats how much it wants DL to show up on those list - hence why the next closest is 40%.
Haha no worries, I hope that didn't come across as a criticism or anything, was just curious if there was something I was missing. Appreciate the follow-up!
Yeah no absolutely thanks for pointing it out. Its the only way I'm gonna catch some of this stuff. I think I have a plan for how to weight eras too which should fix the DL problems for the most part but its going to take some time.
Kinda glad we got see how much your position changed with such a simple fix because it showcases how much it cares about being on those lists because the HOF DL guys all are from eras long ago when people got like 25+ sacks a season. Gotta normalize it and calibrate it somehow. Its a rough model but I wanted to share the rough draft of it all for people to nitpick so I could fix stuff
![[Image: bZJ57LU.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/bZJ57LU.gif)