(03-31-2021, 09:27 PM)MisObvious Wrote:fr?(03-31-2021, 09:25 PM)Blasoon Wrote:I'm in awe at how smooth you are(03-31-2021, 09:18 PM)Attopax Wrote:Fuck, man. I'm in awe at how smooth that sentence is.(03-31-2021, 09:11 PM)zeagle1 Wrote:(03-31-2021, 09:07 PM)Attopax Wrote: HO has cited the "giving TPE to yourself and a friend" as the reason for the removal. Yet, apparently, the evidence shows that mistakes happened more with her than others.
Therefore, tell me how that shows some sort of malicious intent or abuse of power as opposed to just a continuous mistake that was applied across the board just as her predecessors did en masse?
If there was really abuse of power here, the only way these two instances should be used as evidence is a smaller sample size. I.E. - it happened 4 times and two of them was to her and a friend. The fact that it apparently happened more with her than in the past and they can only find 2 instances where it went to her and someone else is evidence AGAINST the fact that there was any foul play going on.
Bro are you a lawyer or something?
Yes. But no lawyer skills needed on this one. The pages of people before me reaching the same conclusion with a fraction of the formal education (and debt lol) is evidence of that.
![[Image: crazywizard98.gif]](https://sig.grumpybumpers.com/host/crazywizard98.gif)
![[Image: crazywizard99.gif]](https://sig.grumpybumpers.com/host/crazywizard99.gif)