Kyamprac Player Progression Head Removal

[qWest]

I had never understood the comments and perception of HO being cold and robotic until I read this. Especially rich for the "rules are rules no matter what" coming out of Head Office, which has flagrantly invented rules and punishments in the past counter to what is in the rulebook.

I pose to you then how you would handle it or suggest anything constructive rather than scathe HO more.

As for robotic, im on here explaining what i can, and this issue and black and white, if you are late then you are late. If you want to open up and make it grey, then you are only gonna get more problems so i really dont see that side of it.

Also new into HO so don't put past acts on me. Me and Swanty are both new, meaning 40% of HO has changed. This can change and will change with this new blood. What would also help move change along is constructive suggestions or feedback on what people think should have occurred or happened so I implore you to tell me how you would handle the deadline for these tasks

It doesn't seem to be worth it to pose the same suggestions as others when that's just being dismissed as something you "really don't see." It's clear that HO is taking the stance that there can never be any grey area and that's why you come off as incredibly cold and out of touch here. If everything has to be black and white and department heads and Head Office can't apply some humanity and discretion then we clearly need to find other people that can do "see that side."

I don't want to make it seem like you're personally responsible for past actions of HO but, as we've seen with this case, existing precedent and processes from previous people in places of power can clearly affect how those currently in power make their decisions. So if we're going to fire one person for that maybe we need to clear everyone else out too.

If you want to take constructive criticism and make changes for the health of the league, plenty of people have already stated it (Mori, r0tz, etc.). 1) Stop relying on appeals to fix BS punishments. 2) Let Department Heads head their departments without HO micromanaging them. 3) If there is an issue needing thorough investigation like this, be transparent with the department head and talk with them about it and how it can be fixed. PPT could teach HO a couple of things about how leniency benefits the league. 4) If HO is going to walk out with a strong punishment they need to come with the receipts at the beginning. 5) Even if votes aren't published, abstentions should be noted just like appeals does.