Kyamprac Player Progression Head Removal

[Z-Whiz]

particularly when a member of head office with a known bias refused to recuse themselves and went so far as to provide the majority of the data used in the decision.

You could argue that the "head" of this investigation has just as much of a bias or preference against Kya as Kya does for approving the TPE in her and Rotz predictions. If Kya should have known better and she's only the head of a department, then someone who is part of the department that runs the entire league certainly should have known better.

It may be a reach (not that Kya's firing wasn't), but if Kya is losing her job for showing bias and taking advantage of her position (whether willfully or accidentally), then Steg should be losing his job for not abstaining from the vote. I don't see how the two situations are different. Both parties were in charge of their respective situations, both have a bias either for/against the parties involved, and both "should have known better".

To be clear, I do not believe either should lose their job. I do not think either did this with malicious intent. I'm simply making this comparison to show how out of wack the Kya ruling is.