(08-07-2017, 02:15 PM)Bzerkap Wrote:For sure. Talk to @timeconsumer, @7hawk77, and @kckolbe about some stat stuff you could do. I know I'm missing some people but those are the guys I've seen do some prominent statistics work, here on the site or elsewhere.
I honestly don't know the right or wrong way to do this, but if I were to do this, I'd probably do it something like this:
First the data...
Total TPE count:
Logan Noble- COL (337 TPE)
Mike Boss- OCO (302 TPE)
Chris Orosz- YKW (282 TPE)
King Bronko- AZ (236 TPE)
Josh Bercovici- LVL (224 TPE)
Scrub Kyubee- BAL (209 TPE)
Jameis Christ- PHI (166 TPE)
Ethan Hunt- SJS (155 TPE)
Shawn Brady- PHI (107 TPE)
Vincent Draxel- AZ (107 TPE)
Next I'd probably create a TPE rating for each player. Formula below:
QB TPE rating = QB total TPE/(highest TPE of any QB)
Logan Noble 100% which is just 337/337
Mike Boss 89.6% which is 302/337
Chris Orosz 83.7%
King Bronko 70%
Josh Bercovici 66.5%
Scrub Kyubee 62%
Jameis Christ 49%
Ethan Hunt 46%
Then Compare them to the Passer Rating for S2:
1. Ethan Hunt - SJS - 92.3% PSR
2. Chris Orosz - YKW - 83.7% PSR
3. Scrub Kyubee - BAL - 77% PSR
Then something like Passer Rating minus TPE rating = TPE effectiveness
TPE Effectiveness means they are playing that much percentage better than they should with the TPE that they have earned
So for example:
Ethan Hunt: 92.3% - 46% = 46.3%
So Ethan Hunt plays 46.3% better than he should for the TPE that he has.
Chris Orosz 83.7% - 83.7% = 0
Chris plays standard exactly equal to how he should given the TPE he has.
Scrub Kyubee 77% - 62% = 15%
Scrub plays 15% better than he should for the TPE that he has.
If the outcome is negative, it means they are playing worse than they should for the TPE that the player has.
etc...
Cheers
