(08-15-2017, 11:05 PM)Ballerstorm Wrote:I really do need to hear better proposals for the tampering rule though. I know it sucks how it's worded and I am not sure how it should be laid out. Maybe I'll.make it a PTI think you have to go with NFL rules which state that
Tampering occurs when the owner, general manager or anyone involved with player acquisition directly mentions or hints at acquiring a player not through a channel that would influence a player to take an action that may affect how they approach their next contract.
For example, if @Bzerkap posts here that he wants Cook, that's tampering. Because it allows Cook to know that he has an option either through trade or through contract expiration to join Yellowknife.
However, if I post that I would like Cook on the team, it's not tampering. I have 0 influence on roster makeup.
If that makes sense.
[div align=center]
![[Image: 55659_s.gif]](https://signavatar.com/55659_s.gif)
![[Image: 52710_s.gif]](http://signavatar.com/52710_s.gif)
[SIZE=4]Player Page || Anoa'i Update Page ||
Quote:We didn't reach out because we didn't want you.
![[Image: 55659_s.gif]](https://signavatar.com/55659_s.gif)
![[Image: 52710_s.gif]](http://signavatar.com/52710_s.gif)
[SIZE=4]Player Page || Anoa'i Update Page ||
Quote:everyone’s favorite mediocre wide receiver, Darren Smallwood.[/align]