(07-27-2021, 10:39 AM)Tomasnz Wrote:ya that comment wasn't in response to you. I have seen 71 suggested to rookies many times and Swanty's comment was referencing confusing the rookies with this post so I wanted to clarify that.(07-27-2021, 09:23 AM)Gragg9 Wrote: I've talked with several people in private about if who have seen the code or done their own testing. I'm the only one that looked at exclusively win percentage with a sample size of a couple thousand and the endurance change applied to the whole team. I'll be running additional tests with higher sample size and possibly position specific changes as and publish the results when ready. Until then I am almost totally confident that no rookie should be getting 71 endurance.
Edit: and to be clear I do concede that 71 endurance does probably exist.
These are two different things. I have never suggested that rookies get 71 but for isfl players I think it is worthwhile
![[Image: Gragg9.gif]](https://sig.grumpybumpers.com/host/Gragg9.gif)