(08-28-2017, 04:37 PM)iamslm22 Wrote:But a reception for a wide out has value. Yes Christmas had more yards per catch, but a wideout with more catches has more value. It's not the same as a QB with better efficiency, you know what I'm saying? I don't know if I'm articulating my point well, but basically a higher volume wide receiver should get credit, it means they're getting open, while a higher volume passer is just game flow and play calling.
There are other factors to it as well, say a qb forcing the ball to a wr instead of checking all options. Or being a number 2 wr, facing a CB that is not the same caliber as the guy facing the number 1 wr. I will give more value to being a number 1 WR the whole season, staying in the same conference (note, everyone seems to think that I believe someones stats should just disappear into the abyss if they're traded, which seems to stem from the bias of the players, but I do not think that and never have), and how they did with the targets they got. Right now I'm compiling stats of both Hackett and Cook, from before they were traded and after, and then we'll see how truly deserving they are of the pro bowl
[div align=center]
![[Image: HzftG7t.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/HzftG7t.gif)
![[Image: YltEe9n.png]](https://i.imgur.com/YltEe9n.png)
[div align=center]
![[Image: HzftG7t.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/HzftG7t.gif)
![[Image: YltEe9n.png]](https://i.imgur.com/YltEe9n.png)
[div align=center]