Out of position penalty

[iamslm22]

It's about having a DT position.  Beginning of last season there was a big deal of almost no one creating CBs because S was so much better.  We buffed CB because of it. 

Now, however, we see that there are almost no DTs, but a LOT of DEs.  We see that DE is more effective at DT, so buffing DT kinda makes sense.

The FS at LB, though, is WAY too effective.  Like I said, the TOP two LBs in the league are S, and neither of them are near the TPE of the players they are beating.  That's a huge red flag.

And yes, in 1.5 seasons, I have played one game at CB and one game at SS.  I also play (complete guess here) 35-40% at NB due to our teams laughable CB depth.  I am talking about primary positions, though (which Bork is a great example of). 

In addition, I play a coverage LB, a hybrid of a traditional LB and a S.  It makes sense for me to move around the field a little.  If Lewith were a run stopping S, I wouldn't care, because that archetype implies that role.  But can you really tell me it makes sense for someone with a FIFTY in tackling and a FORTY in strength to lead the entire league in tackles?

Hmmm that's a good point too. There's no reason for Safeties to be so good at linebacker. I don't know that I have an answer. I don't like not allowing people to play out of position.