(11-08-2017, 04:30 AM)37thchamber Wrote:Pretty sure that's not what happened though, according to what Jiggly says here. The final re-sim was because the previous one failed to save. It was a necessary re-sim. There was no "agreeing to sim again" because there was no choice in the matter.
The issue, from what I can tell, is that Jiggly's thinking is "the original results shouldn't have stood anyway because my roster was ineligible, the final one is the only valid result", whereas the Marshals take the stance "the result prior to the forced re-sim should stand, since that's what would have happened if the sim hadn't failed to save"
It would appear that there is a precedent to be either set or followed here. And once it's done, the HO need to codify it and make it clear what the decision was, and why. Then we can all move on. *shrug*
Yeah, I am not necessarily saying that either of them is right. I don't think either of their arguments is very good. It had to be re-simmed and there should have been a clear judgment before the sim whether or not the new sim would count or the old one. We can't sim and then afterwards decide oh this was just done cause it failed, the original result counted all along. The decision should have been clear before the game.
![[Image: card6.png]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/692421772183601193/1053345472418431016/card6.png)