(11-09-2017, 02:11 PM)iamslm22 Wrote:Saying it's hypocritical to call Archon a douchce or an ass is asinine. If you feel that way about the reports that great! It would've been awesome to hear that two seasons ago! I mean don't act like we're wrong when y'all were ignoring it. He drove people away from the site. That's a fact. HO did nothing about it, and never said anything about our reports. I don't understand how it's so hard for members of the HO to admit a mistake. You said being in the HO isn't fun, I get it. There's no need to be a martyr. But I don't think a lot of us are asking too much.
It is hypocritical, you shouldn't attack or single out a person.
Archon stated multiple times that he gets his enjoyment by stirring up drama.
Should the head office start punishing people for saying Er rigs the sim? Absolutely not. Context matters. It's kind of a fun joke that we can throw unwarranted blame at Er instead of just admitting that the sim does weird stuff. Obviously Er isn't rigging the sim and it's a fun running joke.
Archon giving the hawks shit for "cheating" was how he wanted to stir up drama. Your team could have easily rolled with the punches like Er does, or maybe tried to PM the head office saying "hey i'm getting really tired of this guy putting our team down and diminishing the accomplishments my team made".
Instead you reported his posts with like short reasons like "Obvious troll".
I think you need to understand that calling a specific person a douche, or an ass or "a fucking clown" and other stuff like that reflects poorly on you.
There is a huge difference saying something like "The Otters are going to dumpster the wraiths" vs: "You are an idiot". One spurs rivalry between teams and adds drama and story to the games and match ups. The other is a personal attack where the goal is just to tear the other person down.
I still think that HO handled your reports correctly. I honestly don't even remember if I was head office at the time or if I just had the correct permissions to see the reports from being CO-GM or media grader or something.
The only change that I think the HO could have done better is explain why your reports weren't valid.
