Buttersquanch Second Offense Tampering Punishment

[manicmav36]

"a while ago, we received a complaint of Buttersquach tampering a player under contract with the San Jose Sabercats. After reviewing the various evidence, we have come to the conclusion that Buttersquach did try to convince a player under contract to join the New Orleans Second Line. The conversation was initialized by the player, but Buttersquach clearly continued it and added new talking points with the purpose of persuading the player in question to join the Second Line. For this reason, we have decided to punish Buttersquach with the following:"

VS

"We recently received a complaint regarding user Buttersquanch tampering a player currently under contract. After reviewing the evidence, the Head Office voted unanimously (5-0) that Buttersquanch did, in fact, try to convince a player to request a trade. Buttersquanch heavily suggested that his team would be interested, going so far as to tell that player that he would even mention it to his GM. For this reason, we have levied the following punishment toward Buttersquanch:"

Difference is night and day

We were asked to protect the privacy of those involved, so we did. Anyone who needs to know specifics (those involved, HO, and the appeals team) will be provided with the exact details.

[White Cornerback]

We were asked to protect the privacy of those involved, so we did. Anyone who needs to know specifics (those involved, HO, and the appeals team) will be provided with the exact details.

Aight so that pretty much confirms who did it and what player was involved

[iamslm22]

[ADwyer87]

"a while ago, we received a complaint of Buttersquach tampering a player under contract with the San Jose Sabercats. After reviewing the various evidence, we have come to the conclusion that Buttersquach did try to convince a player under contract to join the New Orleans Second Line. The conversation was initialized by the player, but Buttersquach clearly continued it and added new talking points with the purpose of persuading the player in question to join the Second Line. For this reason, we have decided to punish Buttersquach with the following:"

VS

"We recently received a complaint regarding user Buttersquanch tampering a player currently under contract (With who/what team). After reviewing the evidence, the Head Office voted unanimously (5-0) that Buttersquanch did, in fact, try to convince a player to request a trade (to Austin, I'm guessing). Buttersquanch heavily suggested that his team would be interested, going so far as to tell that player that he would even mention it to his GM. For this reason, we have levied the following punishment toward Buttersquanch:"

SIGH

We know in Sec 1. What team the player is on. In Sec 2 we don't know. We don't have the context.

EDIT: I mean I can tell already who the player is, what team he's on and who's the dude that reported it but I think it might be royally unjust to not have it in the post.

Code:

a while ago, we received a complaint of Buttersquach tampering a player under contract with the San Jose Sabercats.

vs.

We recently received a complaint regarding user Buttersquanch tampering a player currently under contract.

Code:

After reviewing the various evidence, we have come to the conclusion that Buttersquach did try to convince a player under contract to join the New Orleans Second Line.

vs.

After reviewing the evidence, the Head Office voted unanimously (5-0) that Buttersquanch did, in fact, try to convince a player to request a trade

Code:

The conversation was initialized by the player, but Buttersquach clearly continued it and added new talking points with the purpose of persuading the player in question to join the Second Line.

vs.

Buttersquanch heavily suggested that his team would be interested, going so far as to tell that player that he would even mention it to his GM.

Code:

For this reason, we have decided to punish Buttersquach with the following:

vs.

For this reason, we have levied the following punishment toward Buttersquanch:

this post is, like, super similar. besides sentence 3, its almost identical. im pretty confident that if this was an assignment, me and manic would both be hit with plagiarism

[manicmav36]

Code:

a while ago, we received a complaint of Buttersquach tampering a player under contract with the San Jose Sabercats.

vs.

We recently received a complaint regarding user Buttersquanch tampering a player currently under contract.

Code:

After reviewing the various evidence, we have come to the conclusion that Buttersquach did try to convince a player under contract to join the New Orleans Second Line.

vs.

After reviewing the evidence, the Head Office voted unanimously (5-0) that Buttersquanch did, in fact, try to convince a player to request a trade

Code:

The conversation was initialized by the player, but Buttersquach clearly continued it and added new talking points with the purpose of persuading the player in question to join the Second Line.

vs.

Buttersquanch heavily suggested that his team would be interested, going so far as to tell that player that he would even mention it to his GM.

Code:

For this reason, we have decided to punish Buttersquach with the following:

vs.

For this reason, we have levied the following punishment toward Buttersquanch:

this post is, like, super similar. besides sentence 3, its almost identical. im pretty confident that if this was an assignment, me and manic would both be hit with plagiarism

Why change what isn't broken?

[TeyonSchavari]

We were asked to protect the privacy of those involved, so we did. Anyone who needs to know specifics (those involved, HO, and the appeals team) will be provided with the exact details.

but I want to know specifics...is HO hiring?

I don't want to hear about someone getting tampered...I want to actually see someone getting tampered dammit

[White Cornerback]

Code:

a while ago, we received a complaint of Buttersquach tampering a player under contract with the San Jose Sabercats.

vs.

We recently received a complaint regarding user Buttersquanch tampering a player currently under contract.

Code:

After reviewing the various evidence, we have come to the conclusion that Buttersquach did try to convince a player under contract to join the New Orleans Second Line.

vs.

After reviewing the evidence, the Head Office voted unanimously (5-0) that Buttersquanch did, in fact, try to convince a player to request a trade

Code:

The conversation was initialized by the player, but Buttersquach clearly continued it and added new talking points with the purpose of persuading the player in question to join the Second Line.

vs.

Buttersquanch heavily suggested that his team would be interested, going so far as to tell that player that he would even mention it to his GM.

Code:

For this reason, we have decided to punish Buttersquach with the following:

vs.

For this reason, we have levied the following punishment toward Buttersquanch:

this post is, like, super similar. besides sentence 3, its almost identical. im pretty confident that if this was an assignment, me and manic would both be hit with plagiarism

Just that team names were left our entirely, which was the entire focus of my post which you definetly didn't miss by accident, but w/e mav explained it in a post above

[UpperNet]

Wtf

[Bigred1580]

I love how his username is typed 3 different ways and none are his actual username lol

This made me actually laugh out loud

[manicmav36]

This made me actually laugh out loud

I'd like to point out that I literally couldn't include the whole username in the title because it's too long.