Rules That Need Fixing

[Warner]

Secondly, there is no possible way anyone could ever make a rule that specifically addresses each action that shouldn't be allowed. So saying that because something is not specifically listed as being against the rules, just because it's not in the rule book, is just silly.

I have no dog in this fight, but how would something be a violation if it technically doesn’t break any rules? I think it would just be easier if the “don’t be a dick” rule was elaborated upon further (in regards to what would constitute as a violation of the rule) and actually amended to the rulebook so that it can actually be fairly used in punishment statements without causing controversy.

[AdamS]

I have no dog in this fight, but how would something be a violation if it technically doesn’t break any rules? I think it would just be easier if the “don’t be a dick” rule was elaborated upon further (in regards to what would constitute as a violation of the rule) and actually amended to the rulebook so that it can actually be fairly used in punishment statements without causing controversy.

The issue I foresee here is that any application of this idea would basically create an open ended power to decide that in an official way. People would not be happy with that shit.

[gucci]

Actual good rule suggestion. Allow IA players to claim TPE they previously earned upon returning up to the next contract minimum tier. The current rule has them lumped in with people trying to game the regression system and is clearly a punishment for people who went IA rather than a legit rule in place to protect league integrity.

[iseedoug]

Any team losing FA signed with over 500 TPE will be awarded a compensatory pick in the following year's draft. (maybe have this tiered based on TPE) If you sign a player it will cancel out the loss.

I have always wanted a rule like this, and I remember having some long discord discussions on it (maybe in GM chat?). But basically it would be a ton of work to implement, not only that but drafts fluctuate in size a ton, which makes awarding the pick even harder. While the past few drafts have been huge, it definitely used to fluctuate from 2 rounds to like 10 rounds over and over again.

[Bigred1580]

permaban for anyone who says a hotdog is a sandwich who says no

A hotdog is a sandwich

[Hallmonitor_20]

N
I’m not saying oh woe is me boo boo cry for the MDM and HO.

Flexing his MDM already

[ScorpXCracker]

A hotdog is a sandwich

ban

[timeconsumer]

Oh man 2017 me caused a lot of trouble lol.

Okay lets go in order here:

The mobile running QB thing is unrelated to the linked thread about WRs. That was us trying to discover the issue with WR at QB that we first found in the EFL with running QBs there, so we first thought the running box was the cause. We later learned it wasn't.

However I have never actually seen the running QB box have any sort of an effect at all. In fact it was so useless that's why the Spread playbook was modified in order to add in more designed runs. And it does it with or without that box.

@PMoney I've never heard or personally seen that the mobile box causes any positive or negative effect on win rate. Can you share your findings with me on the subject? I'd like to see what you've found.


Coming up next:

I wrote the "Don't be a Dick" Rule.

It was a joke.

End of story.

[Warner]

I wrote the "Don't be a Dick" Rule.

It was a joke.

End of story.

Well I guess that settles it then

[siddhus]

Can we properly document the Awards rules?
Breakoutplayer of the year got missed off in DSFL, rip Frost.
Also I propose we split the DB award in safety and cornerback separate awards.

I believe this is because CB can play S and S can play CB, but dont quote me on that