I vote @Daybe because he's probably a robot IRL and therefore probably a robot in-game.
![[Image: welcomeBraxtonEast.png?ex=677e7b1f&is=67...y=lossless]](https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/357281973594619905/1319836335887880192/welcomeBraxtonEast.png?ex=677e7b1f&is=677d299f&hm=c03a86226787bfca2f2d024eb23c800c6f1ecd647532e0419a9d0218636d40e4&=&format=webp&quality=lossless)
![[Image: baby-yoda-by-jango-sm.png]](https://i.ibb.co/1rgfYXP/baby-yoda-by-jango-sm.png)
Thanks to Jangorhino for the sig.
|
Offline  Offline  (05-13-2018, 12:31 AM)AdamS Wrote:how'd the immediate suspicion and random voting in the 1st round work out during the last game? To be fair...the lack of voting in the last game allowed the wolves to control the votes and pick of villagers during the day and then kill someone at night too. Day 1 Lynch: 3 votes, 2 wolves and TC Day 2 Lynch: 3 votes, 2 wolves and Jester Had the villagers actually voted wolves wouldn't have been able to pick the villagers off like that.
that's not really an accurate assessment of how it went down
on day 1 the the person who got lynched did so because of who they were and how they played and had in fact railed against all 3 who ended up voting for him.....had none of the 3 voters been wolves..he STILL would've been voted out exactly the same on day 2 there was actually a proxy war between what turned out to be the hunter and a vanilla bean villager the ended with an inactive 3rd person being voted out....again...nothing would've changed the villagers shot themselves.....literally.....the hunter shot an innocent villager on night 2 ![[Image: 68.png]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/722696337912496132/759304283312881684/68.png) (05-12-2018, 11:46 PM)AdamS Wrote:that's not really an accurate assessment of how it went down Evidence I should never again be trusted as a hunter. Good thing we don't have one in this version. However I agree more with adam2's assessment. By half of the players remaining inactive by not voting or even talking the wolves were able to let the village beat itself. They stepped in only when necessary which kept suspicions low. They were lauded as having played a perfect game which tells me the may try the same here this time. The biggest technical difference here is that the robots can't overpower a vote. In the last game we played, because not everyone voted, the wolves were able to effectively vote whoever they wanted dead. Noone got more than 4 votes, I don't think anyone even finished with 3 iirc. But in this version robots will need villagers to vote since they can't do it alone. They need to be more persuasive and can't rely on village to kill themselves off. Just some thoughts. Watch out for the increased persuasiveness from the robots this time around. Offline (05-12-2018, 10:31 PM)AdamS Wrote:how'd the immediate suspicion and random voting in the 1st round work out during the last game? If memory serves correctly, you won that game. And so did I. Time to double down on this strategy. Thanks to Jangorhino for the sig. Offline 
05-13-2018, 06:24 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-13-2018, 08:19 AM by DeathOnReddit.)
(05-13-2018, 01:54 AM)AdamS Wrote:if Death was a robot he'd just declare and do half the work for us Carried by RunCMC im voting and if u dont wanna im voting you ![[Image: bxKqp91.png]](https://i.imgur.com/bxKqp91.png)
I don't have another person I'm suspicious of, but I can promise if you vote me off you'll regret it.
|
|
|
![[Image: BC5HKor.png]](https://i.imgur.com/BC5HKor.png)
![[Image: LPLD95s.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/LPLD95s.gif)
![[Image: 56106_s.gif]](https://signavatar.com/56106_s.gif)
![[Image: TBFYuND.png]](https://i.imgur.com/TBFYuND.png)
