S23 ISFL Pro Bowl

[Oles]

smh yall can't behave

be happy you're in

stop wondering who didn't vote for you

pro bowl and awards are celebrations of good seasons, and being nominated in itself is a high honor

i can't wait for the utter bullshit that is gonna happen on these forums after the awards ceremony

oh god what is gonna happen that forums gonna go ballistic after awards ceremony

[infinitempg]

oh god what is gonna happen that forums gonna go ballistic after awards ceremony

votes are public and will be released after the show.

technically we were supposed to be releasing them since the S21 show but we forgot

let the witch hunts begin

[shadyshoelace]

Gameplanning is the answer to all of your points. We run a slower tempo ground attack system that makes us win. You run a system that makes you pass a lot as a mobile QB and run a high tempo, and admittedly it sometimes makes you win. I have no doubt you'd have been 3 seed in the NSFC. But if you and Amrstrong run the same strats with the same defense with the same opponents over the same season, Armstrong might beat you with the slower tempo ground attack and you might beat him with the high tempo air attack. Unfortunately we aren't in a vacuum and thus are unable to exactly compare. But I do believe Armstrong had an edge because of efficiency and wins.

I haven't looked at the effect on individual stats and I'm not inclined to bother with it now, but at least on a team level tempo/volume in this sim does trade off with efficiency. I don't have access to the screenshots because they're in GM chat (probably the old one?), but I ran some tests on YKW/AUS/OCO offenses a couple seasons ago when spec was making these same efficiency-based arguments about OCO's offense and the results were pretty clear. That means that (probably) you can either have volume or efficiency, and there's no reason to inherently prefer one over the other. Cue had great season with great volume; Armstrong had a great season with great efficiency. If Cue had fewer attempts, he would have gotten closer to Armstrong's efficiency, and vice versa. This is a silly debate.

Thank you for coming to my ted talk.

[CLG Rampage]

I haven't looked at the effect on individual stats and I'm not inclined to bother with it now, but at least on a team level tempo/volume in this sim does trade off with efficiency. I don't have access to the screenshots because they're in GM chat (probably the old one?), but I ran some tests on YKW/AUS/OCO offenses a couple seasons ago when spec was making these same efficiency-based arguments about OCO's offense and the results were pretty clear. That means that (probably) you can either have volume or efficiency, and there's no reason to inherently prefer one over the other. Cue had great season with great volume; Armstrong had a great season with great efficiency. If Cue had fewer attempts, he would have gotten closer to Armstrong's efficiency, and vice versa. This is a silly debate.

Thank you for coming to my ted talk.

God, it's almost as if different offenses have different tradeoffs and each team makes it work the best way they can!

[run_CMC]

votes are public and will be released after the show.

technically we were supposed to be releasing them since the S21 show but we forgot

let the witch hunts begin

I'm just here so i don't get fined

[YoungTB]

Imagine being the best RB in the league, much less the NSFC, and STILL missing a vote.

Whoever did it, I hope you stub your toe really, really hard

Get used to it

[CLG Rampage]

Get used to it

I'll probably get boned when my hour comes too

[YoungTB]

I'll probably get boned when my hour comes too

As long as you don’t hurt any precious little feelings along the way apparently, you’ll be good

[CLG Rampage]

As long as you don’t hurt any precious little feelings along the way apparently, you’ll be good

Coinflip odds, then

[TomHanks]

Jamar Lackson 308 touches 1320 yards 7 TDs

Baby Yoda 368 touches, 1471 yards, 10 TDs

KKM 288 touches 1541 yards 9 TDs

Forrest Gump 260 touches 1661 yards 10 TDs


Y'all suck amiright @gucci