Bank "Credit" Announcement

[Silver Fox]

Can this be implemented starting next update? I already did my updates and transactions for this week following the old rule and it would be a pain to change.

[CubsFan19]

Can we get media graded quicker then? Its impossible to put updates in when youre waiting a minimum of 7 days and probably more.

[CubsFan19]

Can this be implemented starting next update? I already did my updates and transactions for this week following the old rule and it would be a pain to change.

Agreed.

[Admin]

Can we get media graded quicker then? Its impossible to put updates in when youre waiting a minimum of 7 days and probably more.

@Grapehead @adam2552 how will this work?

[adam2552]

@Grapehead @adam2552 how will this work?

We wait 7 days after replies stop because that allows for any discussions to continue and for the writer to make sure it's finalized. Maybe we could move that to 5 days, but I'm not sure how much a difference that would really make. We can't do next day grading or same day grading, that would be too unreasonable for the graders.

[Bzerkap]

We wait 7 days after replies stop because that allows for any discussions to continue and for the writer to make sure it's finalized.  Maybe we could move that to 5 days, but I'm not sure how much a difference that would really make.  We can't do next day grading or same day grading, that would be too unreasonable for the graders.

Could we require a statement by the article writer telling you it's ready to be graded? Once you receive that you grade but leave it out for discussion.

Would that be too hard to keep track of? Sounds like it could get messy

[Valtookan]

The bank has been allowing users to continue to withdraw money past the -$2m threshold so long as they indicated they had some incoming payout from media/graphics/etc. The intention of this exception was to prevent a player from missing a week of training, and falling behind their peers, because a payout was pending. With this in mind, users may only withdraw money for their weekly training when below -$2m (and they still need to have an incoming payout).



We understand this may be a pain in the butt, but the current system is outreaching its intention. If you have any questions or suggestions, please let me know.

Some how I have a feeling this was targeted towards the Debt Champion himself: Stormblessed

>_>

[adam2552]

Could we require a statement by the article writer telling you it's ready to be graded? Once you receive that you grade but leave it out for discussion.

Would that be too hard to keep track of? Sounds like it could get messy

How would that even work? When ready to be graded they tag all the graders and say ready to be graded? I think that would set an unreasonable expectation for the articles to be graded almost instantly.

[Bzerkap]

How would that even work? When ready to be graded they tag all the graders and say ready to be graded? I think that would set an unreasonable expectation for the articles to be graded almost instantly.

No no tagging. Just have like a code at the bottom with ready to be graded or something. Many writers already do this. Maybe you could implement a routine check every three or four days or something?? Just thoughts

Code:

Ready to be Graded

[adam2552]

No no tagging. Just have like a code at the bottom with ready to be graded or something. Many writers already do this. Maybe you could implement a routine check every three or four days or something?? Just thoughts

Code:

Ready to be Graded

If anyone can set up a web skimming tool for this we could do it. But I don't think asking the graders to check through 8 pages of articles 2-3 times a week to find that code is reasonable.