To answer your questions...
Do you realize how bad it is to evaluate anything on a per completion basis?
I realize how bad it is for your argument to use completions yes.
Incompletions are, hot take here, bad. You can't just throw them out when evaluating QB play. In fact the way you're evaluating this, it would be even better in your eyes if Havran had completed 100 passes instead.
What does this even mean? Like it seems to be claiming its making a point but gives no info. If Havran had 100 completions but these stats? Are you saying my argument is that that ludicrously impossible scenario would be better? I have no clue what this argument is supposed to look like when fully formed.
Armstrong just had the single most efficient QB season - not just by passer rating but by literally any conceivable metric that doesn't use completions as a denominator - in league history. In terms of totals, he finished with more yards and 4 fewer touchdowns.
Calling him the most efficient relies 100% on a higher completion percentage to make the entire case. But okay...lets use attempts then. And since you wanted to add rushing stats in for SOME parts, we'll actually use them too.
Havran's 7.55 yards per attempt beats Armstrong's 7.52.
Havran's 7.14 TD% handily beats Armstrong's 5.88 TD%
So...those are some pretty important stats.
OCO had the best record in the league.
And? The defense giving up 60 fewer points will do that. Neither have much to do with the QBs play. Its a sneak argument, like if I had gone on about how Armstrong's already won two MVPs in a row.
Do you realize how bad it is to evaluate anything on a per completion basis?
I realize how bad it is for your argument to use completions yes.
Incompletions are, hot take here, bad. You can't just throw them out when evaluating QB play. In fact the way you're evaluating this, it would be even better in your eyes if Havran had completed 100 passes instead.
What does this even mean? Like it seems to be claiming its making a point but gives no info. If Havran had 100 completions but these stats? Are you saying my argument is that that ludicrously impossible scenario would be better? I have no clue what this argument is supposed to look like when fully formed.
Armstrong just had the single most efficient QB season - not just by passer rating but by literally any conceivable metric that doesn't use completions as a denominator - in league history. In terms of totals, he finished with more yards and 4 fewer touchdowns.
Calling him the most efficient relies 100% on a higher completion percentage to make the entire case. But okay...lets use attempts then. And since you wanted to add rushing stats in for SOME parts, we'll actually use them too.
Havran's 7.55 yards per attempt beats Armstrong's 7.52.
Havran's 7.14 TD% handily beats Armstrong's 5.88 TD%
So...those are some pretty important stats.
OCO had the best record in the league.
And? The defense giving up 60 fewer points will do that. Neither have much to do with the QBs play. Its a sneak argument, like if I had gone on about how Armstrong's already won two MVPs in a row.
![[Image: 68.png]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/722696337912496132/759304283312881684/68.png)
