I don't have a horse in this race at all but it sounds like the policy was originally written immediately after a situation almost exactly the same as this. One was super messed up and then when looking into it further other team mistakes were found. So if the policy was written directly because of that instance, why would there be a re-sim on nearly the same thing happening again?
Stating this is a new HO and shouldn't be held responsible for prior rules/policies is just odd. In what way does that ever make sense?
It seems most are content with the solution but the fact remains the policy should be looked at. Again, the policy was originally written IN RESPONSE to a game breaking error, so why ever write the policy in the first place.
Stating this is a new HO and shouldn't be held responsible for prior rules/policies is just odd. In what way does that ever make sense?
It seems most are content with the solution but the fact remains the policy should be looked at. Again, the policy was originally written IN RESPONSE to a game breaking error, so why ever write the policy in the first place.
![[Image: ST.update.jpg]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/764072200021606412/822924301467779162/ST.update.jpg)
