(07-17-2017, 11:29 PM)SimmerDownBruhh Wrote:After reranking them and going through the stats, the Outlaws would have had the best trio if Bronko stayed. Just with his stats alone with not playing the rest of the games, the Outlaws edged out the top spot from the Wraiths by a slim margin (2.16 ranking for the Outlaws/2.17 for the Wraiths), mostly because of the yards he had and more receptions raised their overall rank. The Touchdowns didn't hurt either but they already had the top spot so it was just extra icing.
If Bronko stats were in and not Tkachuk, the NSFL Averages would look like this:
Receptions: 179
Receiving Yards: 2232
AVG Yards Per Catch: 12.50
AVG Touchdowns: 11
AVGTrio Receptions %: 71%
AVG Touchdowns %: 73%
With Bronko in your trio, the Outlaws' stats go from what was in that table to this:
Arizona Outlaws:
Combined Receptions: 161 (Below Average)
Trio Combined Receiving Yards: 2334 (Above Average)
Trio AVG Yards Per Catch: 14.49 (Above Average)
Trio Combined Touchdowns: 16 (Above Average)
Trio Receptions %: 69% (Below Average)
Trio Touchdowns %: 80% (Above Average
Below Average: 2 out of 6
Average: 0 out of 6
Above Average: 4 out of 6
So yeah, they would have flipped the script in this article if he continued. Like I said in the article, the only reason I never put him in because he didn't play 14 games at receiver.
Yo, this article is amazing! Simply freaking amazing. Dude I hope you get a big a** bonus for this. This is incredible! I loved everything about it, the concept, the easiness of the read, grading system. It was awesome. I'm even feel tired for you having to go back and do this little blurb with King Bronko in it, but I greatly appreciate it. Thanks dude, man this is one of the best articles I've ever seen.
[div align=\"center\"]
[/div]
[div align=\"center\"]
[/div]
[div align=center]
![[Image: tdIRa8F.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/tdIRa8F.jpg)
[div align=\"center\"]
![[Image: POeY5vc.png]](https://i.imgur.com/POeY5vc.png)
[div align=center]