Dear Media

[Memento Mori]

So basically you're punishing someone because they wrote too much and made too much money while giving other passes because they weren't as creative nor have as much money? Even though both articles have the same amount of league content?

The amount paid to player should have to relevance to any article they have written in the past. It should only involve the one being graded. More than that, punishing someone just because they did more is absurd.

Not what I’m saying, but I don’t think it’d be a crime to take those things into account. There’s usually a little more leeway shown to, for example, New User A who writes a backstory light on league content because they’re new and they need money to afford to improve their player. I think there was less league content in the post in question than many of those linked, and I think ‘league characters play a tabletop game’ is far more removed from ‘league characters do things related to their football career’ and that it’s fair to take that into account. I’d also disagree with the notion that more divorced from football necessarily makes it more creative or that creativity should be one of the more important factors when grading an NSFL media piece.

I don’t think it’s absurd to scrutinise longer pieces more, either.