(08-18-2017, 10:17 AM)37thchamber Wrote:I'm not so sure...
If this was the case, then wouldn't his player page have been updated by an updater since, and therefore have the "last edited by..." line?
Or are we suggesting that in the brief window between being someone approving the build, and the thread actually being locked, he went back and edited the initial post? I mean, that's entirely possible, but I dunno if there's any way to prove it. And without any proof, I don't think it would be right to call this cheating. If we do, then ANY mistake like this will have to be treated the same way, and that's madness.
Again, not saying you're wrong. I just think we should be careful about how we react to this.
I know there is no way he would have been approved by Noble (especially after already having a discrepancy caught once), and since there is no way to know how long it took for the thread to be locked (I know my thread wasn't locked immediately after approval, so it could have been a little while before it was locked), we really don't know how it happened. It just bugs me that something like this would take 11 weeks to be caught.
[div align=center]
![[Image: HzftG7t.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/HzftG7t.gif)
![[Image: YltEe9n.png]](https://i.imgur.com/YltEe9n.png)
[div align=center]
![[Image: HzftG7t.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/HzftG7t.gif)
![[Image: YltEe9n.png]](https://i.imgur.com/YltEe9n.png)
[div align=center]