Out of position penalty

[kckolbe]

Yea this is a great point. Everyone knows you play DT. What's stopping another team from getting 4 awesome DEs? And what's stopping Philly from playing Hendrix inside at guard to stop you? I'm also unsure about Safety, but I think the out of position thing is fine, unless we want players to incur a penalty. I'm pretty sure in the NSFC championship game Cushing played corner to cover Christmas, but I could be wrong. Teams play dudes all over the field all the time.

It's about having a DT position. Beginning of last season there was a big deal of almost no one creating CBs because S was so much better. We buffed CB because of it.

Now, however, we see that there are almost no DTs, but a LOT of DEs. We see that DE is more effective at DT, so buffing DT kinda makes sense.

The FS at LB, though, is WAY too effective. Like I said, the TOP two LBs in the league are S, and neither of them are near the TPE of the players they are beating. That's a huge red flag.

And yes, in 1.5 seasons, I have played one game at CB and one game at SS. I also play (complete guess here) 35-40% at NB due to our teams laughable CB depth. I am talking about primary positions, though (which Bork is a great example of).

In addition, I play a coverage LB, a hybrid of a traditional LB and a S. It makes sense for me to move around the field a little. If Lewith were a run stopping S, I wouldn't care, because that archetype implies that role. But can you really tell me it makes sense for someone with a FIFTY in tackling and a FORTY in strength to lead the entire league in tackles?