(10-20-2017, 08:11 AM)JuOSu Wrote:Honestly, going through profiles yesterday, I was shocked to see how many players I thought were very active based on their stats were actually inactive for a while already. Given the around 40% activity rate I found yesterday, I will argue that this is something that will be an issue here constantly, with people just randomly going inactive, starting at 50 TPE all the way to the highest TPE possible and anywhere inbetween. At some point teams will have to make a decision who to play and who to sit, but given the massive inactivity, I think we are a ways away from that.
This was something I noticed recently as well. Right now, there aren't enough active players to fill every NSFL roster spot so playing an inactive is better than a bot. Once we have full rosters of actice/semi-active members, I hope the inactive get sent down to DSFL or forced into retirement. Nothing will deter a new active user more than being passed up for an inactive with more TPE. We are still a couple seasons from full rosters but it is still something that should be proactively considered.
[div align=center][/select]![[Image: RhrM963.png]](https://i.imgur.com/RhrM963.png)
[div align=center]
![[Image: RhrM963.png]](https://i.imgur.com/RhrM963.png)
[div align=center]