*Analyzing activity across positions

[iamslm22]

SHOES ON THE OTHER FOOT NOW!

but if that's the case it is 41%

Buit here's the question, can we break it down by DE and DT?

Here's the real question to active linemen, if you could switch to a different position at no penalty, would you?

100000000% BUT only if it didn't hurt the Hawks. I don't wanna screw the guys over by switching, but would definitely rather not be an o Lineman.

[HalfEatenOnionBagel]

100000000% BUT only if it didn't hurt the Hawks. I don't wanna screw the guys over by switching, but would definitely rather not be an o Lineman.

Same, I play OL because it's a need but if I knew that there was something in place so that switching wouldn't hurt my team or give another team more of an advantage I would.

[sapp2013]

SHOES ON THE OTHER FOOT NOW!

but if that's the case it is 41%

Buit here's the question, can we break it down by DE and DT?

Here's the real question to active linemen, if you could switch to a different position at no penalty, would you?

Ha. And 40.625%. I consider it close enough and only differs because numbers don't line up perfectly.

We have to think how many OL will switch to DT and DT switch to OL.

[tlk742]

So if no one is having fun being an O-lineman, why keep it? We should have fun with this.

[Bzerkap]

Yea I would switch and like it was said earlier you can’t simply look at raw numbers. You have to look at the type of people who play these positions.

[sapp2013]

So if no one is having fun being an O-lineman, why keep it?  We should have fun with this.

I think the argument is maybe o line is not the only position and we are singling it out without checking the numbers.

[iamslm22]

I think the argument is maybe o line is not the only position and we are singling it out without checking the numbers.

Every other position is more enjoyable AND doesn't have a crisis. People are creating other positions. Clearly O Line is the least desirable position, and the best ones want to switch.

[sapp2013]

Every other position is more enjoyable AND doesn't have a crisis. People are creating other positions. Clearly O Line is the least desirable position, and the best ones want to switch.

According to earlier, DL are just as inactive at 40%. I don't know how people feel about the positions since I don't play them, so I am not touching that aspext. I agree we should remove o line, but for thoroughness, we need to exercise all arguments.

[ErMurazor]

If somebody suggests we replace DL with bots I riot.

[tlk742]

If somebody suggests we replace DL with bots I riot.

Well right because there's some glory to being a D-lineman, not so much with O-line, people did it out of need rather than desire.