Following the Hawks' victory over the Wraiths in the NSFC championship game, there was a detail brought to the attention of the head office. Erasmo Broadway had 100 agility instead of the 75 it's supposed to be. The numbers in the update sheet had been entered incorrectly to 775, rather than 75, and it defaulted to 100.
Before any speculations are made, I'd like to point out that @HENDRIX was the one to come forward with this information.
In addition, all NSFL GMs (@Bzerkap included) were made aware of this and invited to help us determine the most reasonable course of action, seeing as how delicate a matter this is. Trust me when I say, that after extensive discussion, our decision isn't one we take lightly and we understand that no matter what we had landed on, a number of people would be understandably upset that it occurred at all.
We have collectively come to the agreement that a re-sim would not set the right precedent - not all update errors are deserving of a complete re-sim.
In this case, the sim has been analyzed by multiple people, with everyone determining that Broadway had a very minimal impact, not only by reviewing his stat sheet, but each of his individual coverage assignments and tackles.
Re-sims are only to be enacted in the most critical situations, especially with so much on the line, however, we do understand that people will be frustrated with this, so we are taking measures to prevent it from happening again in the future. Conditional formatting will be implemented. This will prevent specifically these types of errors from occurring, and our update team will be diligently looking for additional ways to improve the process. We welcome any and all relevant suggestions as well, of course.
Before any speculations are made, I'd like to point out that @HENDRIX was the one to come forward with this information.
In addition, all NSFL GMs (@Bzerkap included) were made aware of this and invited to help us determine the most reasonable course of action, seeing as how delicate a matter this is. Trust me when I say, that after extensive discussion, our decision isn't one we take lightly and we understand that no matter what we had landed on, a number of people would be understandably upset that it occurred at all.
We have collectively come to the agreement that a re-sim would not set the right precedent - not all update errors are deserving of a complete re-sim.
In this case, the sim has been analyzed by multiple people, with everyone determining that Broadway had a very minimal impact, not only by reviewing his stat sheet, but each of his individual coverage assignments and tackles.
Re-sims are only to be enacted in the most critical situations, especially with so much on the line, however, we do understand that people will be frustrated with this, so we are taking measures to prevent it from happening again in the future. Conditional formatting will be implemented. This will prevent specifically these types of errors from occurring, and our update team will be diligently looking for additional ways to improve the process. We welcome any and all relevant suggestions as well, of course.
